Das Portal rund um Daily Fantasy Sports & Sportwetten! Anfänger- & Expertentipps ✓ Strategien ✓ Neuigkeiten ✓ und großes Fantasy Sports Forum! How To Think Like A Daily Fantasy Football Winner: Applying psychological lessons from the poker table and Wall Street to capture a competitive edge in. DAILY FANTASY SITE IN EUROPE. More than 50 different leagues & sports. Play in the largest daily fantasy tournaments in Europe. open tournaments right.
Daily fantasy sports firms FanDuel, DraftKings in merger talks -sourcesPlayON is the best place to win cash prizes playing daily fantasy football, basketball, golf, cricket, rugby, tennis and more. Make your first deposit and receive a. In den USA ist Daily Fantasy Sports schon fester Bestandteil der Sportkultur. Der Platzhirsch heißt FanDuel. Das gegründete und mit Wagniskapital. How To Think Like A Daily Fantasy Football Winner: Applying psychological lessons from the poker table and Wall Street to capture a competitive edge in.
Daily Fantasy Top 10 Ranked DFR Players VideoWeek 13 Fantasy Football Final Thoughts 🏈 DraftKings NFL DFS, Daily Fantasy Football NFL Week 13
Die MГglichkeit zu haben, Daily Fantasy kann man nicht genau sagen. - BeschreibungThe games have surged in popularity as advancing technology made it easier to create fictional teams of athletes from professional sports leagues, and to monitor their statistics.
The second game of Semi Final Week for is set for Saturday night with a massive game between old Victorian foes Geelong and Collingwood. The Panthers and the Storm will go toe-to-toe in attempt to win it all!
As always, Tom runs you through his best plays for this huge Draftstars slate. Please note that it may take a few minutes for changes to appear in your profile and in rankings tables.
Thank you for creating an account at Daily Fantasy Rankings. We have sent you an email to verify your email address. Simply click on the link contained within the email to login to DFR and see where you are ranked!
NRL, Draftstars. Victor Oladipo NBA. Anthony Davis NBA. Chris Godwin NFL. Mike Evans NFL. Dominate Daily Fantasy Basketball.
Try Them Out. Why Daily Fantasy Fuel? Understanding what factors go into assembling a winning lineup is critical to becoming a succesful fantasy sports player.
How many minutes more will a player get when a late breaking injury is announced? What is causing NFL mid-week betting line movement?
Daily Fantasy Fuel is the place to research everything you need to lock in the best lineup. Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of did not state that a legal, paid fantasy sports competition had to last for an entire season.
DraftKings gained a local, Somerville -based competitor in StarStreet, when it introduced a daily fantasy game of its own. DraftKings and FanDuel in particular became the subjects of venture capital investments by various parties; in April , Major League Baseball invested an undisclosed amount in DraftKings, becoming the first U.
DraftKings and FanDuel began to pursue advertising and endorsement deals with sports franchises and leagues; in November , DraftKings entered into a multi-year sponsorship deal with the National Hockey League , complementing team-level sponsorship deals it had reached with seven NHL franchises.
Also in November, the National Basketball Association acquired an equity stake in FanDuel and entered into a four-year sponsorship deal with the company.
By , the daily fantasy sports industry had experienced a major growth in mainstream popularity. The rise was credited to several factors, including the convenience of the format, the ability to access the services on mobile devices , and aggressive marketing campaigns which promoted the prospective cash prizes of their largest contests.
Writing for The New York Times Magazine , Jay Caspian Kang noted that despite its similarities to gambling, DFS appealed to mainstream sports fans because it evoked the feelings of community commonly associated with traditional fantasy sports, rather than the "shady underground games" of poker.
In July , Yahoo! Sports website. In , daily fantasy sports began to face increased legal scrutiny. In August , a class action lawsuit was filed against DraftKings, alleging that it engaged in false advertising in regards to a promotion in which the service claimed it would double a new user's first deposit.
The suit alleged that DraftKings would only credit the deposit bonus to a player's account if they fulfill certain monetary and participation requirements within four months, causing them to "incur additional and substantial monetary obligations", rather than instantly receive the bonus as implied by advertising.
In the wake of the scandal, multiple class-action lawsuits were filed against both DraftKings and FanDuel, with suits alleging charges such as fraud, racketeering , negligence, and false advertising, arguing that the employees' use of inside information had made the games unfair.
One of the lawsuits were filed by a resident of New Orleans, despite paid fantasy games being illegal in the state.
FanDuel objected to the lawsuit, arguing that its use of his likeness fell within existing case law surrounding the use of player names and statistics in fantasy sports games.
In December , Canadian media company TheScore launched QuickDraft, a daily fantasy game targeted at both Canada and the United States, based on the intellectual property of its acquisition of Swoopt.
In contrast to other DFS services and in an effort to work around the increased scrutiny and uncertain legality of paid games, the service is being positioned as a free-to-play service with smaller cash prizes, a more "casual" atmosphere with fewer " sharks ", and the possibility of being advertising-funded in the future.
DraftKings and FanDuel attempted to merge in , but the deal was shelved after the U. Federal Trade Commission threatened to block it over concerns that the combined company would have a monopoly on paid DFS.
In May , the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of —which outlawed state legalization of sports betting in most U. National Collegiate Athletic Association.
The following month, Delaware became the first state to create new legislation to allow sports betting,  followed shortly by New Jersey.
Analysts predicted that the duopoly of DraftKings and FanDuel would make moves to capitalize on the decision, including leveraging their regulatory expertise and influence to lobby for state legalization of sports betting, and incorporating betting features into their platforms to take advantage of their existing market positions and brand recognition.
The aggressive marketing tactics used by daily fantasy services have also affected the growth of the industry. DraftKings and FanDuel also became known for their use of direct response advertising on television, especially during sports telecasts.
The increased legal scrutiny surrounding DFS resulted in providers spending less on marketing in order to focus more on legal costs. There are conflicting arguments over whether paid daily fantasy sports games constitute gambling , due to its mixture of chance -based and skill -based elements.
In an " IAmA " thread on Reddit , DraftKings CEO Jason Robins described the service as being "almost identical to a casino ", described the concept of DFS as a cross between fantasy sports and online poker , and repeatedly referred to the service using gambling-oriented terms such as "wager" and "betting".
Viacom, Inc. Cavanaugh of the U. District Court of New Jersey distinguished an "entry fee" in a paid fantasy sports competition as being a fee required to participate rather than a "wager", because they are "paid unconditionally", and because the prizes in such games were "guaranteed" and determined in advance.
Bloomberg Businessweek acknowledged that daily fantasy contests are often won by a minority of skilled professional players, or " sharks ", who employ "elaborate statistical modeling and automated tools that can manage hundreds of entries at once and identify the weakest opponents".
A DFS player interviewed by Bloomberg argued that "no matter how much somebody knows about sports, if you put an established player up against a new player, that established player's probably going to have a 75 percent chance of winning—at least.
FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles disputed the accuracy of the study, arguing that its daily fantasy baseball contests do not have as many participants as those it runs for football.
Writing for The New York Times Magazine , Jay Caspian Kang argued that DFS games themselves were "not inherently crooked", explaining that "most of the benefits praised by its enthusiasts — the ease of play, the camaraderie among fans, the challenge of solving what amounts to a math puzzle — are real.
It does take skill to parse game film, diligently follow the news and interpret the thousands of bits of sports information that are generated each night.
If a problem gambler at the poker rooms I frequent in New York City were to hire a programmer and flood the D. In response to these concerns, DFS services implemented changes to improve the fairness and transparency of their contests, including entry limits, banning off-site scripts, identifying veteran-level players, allowing users to block players they do not wish to compete against, and adding beginner-level contests intended for new users.
Each state applies varying standards in regards to determining whether a game is one of skill, or of chance; in most states, this determination is based on whether the skill-based elements of the game are predominant over those of chance, and whether these chance-based elements have more than an incidental effect on the outcome of the game dominant factor test , material degree.
He determined that DFS would likely be classified as a game of chance under Canadian law, going on to say in an interview that under the Criminal Code of Canada , games that mix chance- and skill-based elements are considered games of chance.
However, Canadian authorities have not yet targeted DFS services; historically, the government has only targeted illegal gambling operations that have a presence within the country.
The UIGEA has frequently been cited as having exempted daily fantasy games from being considered gambling, as the law does not consider an online contest with pre-determined prizes, and an outcome based on skill that is "determined predominantly by accumulated statistical results of sporting events, including any non-participant's individual performances in such sporting events", to be unlawful wagering.
The act itself does not define unlawful internet wagering, and expressly refrains from altering the legality of any underlying conduct other than funds transfers, meaning that state law remains binding.
Daily fantasy services have historically blocked residents of Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana and Washington from participating in paid games, under a presumption that DFS is illegal in these states due to the strictness of their gambling laws.
Louisiana attempted to pass a law that would exempt fantasy sports from its anti-online gambling laws, but the bill was defeated as the result of lobbying by both the Louisiana Family Forum which showed concerns that players could develop an addiction to daily fantasy games , and the Louisiana Video Gaming Association which felt that DFS would cannibalize the legal video poker industry, and needed to be highly regulated.
On October 15, , the Nevada Gaming Control Board published a memorandum ruling that daily fantasy sports games were a form of sports wagering, and that DFS services must cease serving customers in the state of Nevada until they obtain a sports pool license.
On January 17, , Attorney General of Texas Ken Paxton issued an opinion, stating that "it is prohibited gambling in Texas if you bet on the performance of a participant in a sporting event and the house takes a cut.
He explained that "the technology may have changed, but the vice has not. He argued that while picking players for a fantasy team is an activity of skill, player performance can vary, and Alabama law dictates that it is illegal to risk something of value on any game with an element of chance.
In September , the state of Massachusetts tabled a bill exploring the possibility of allowing the Massachusetts Lottery to run online, skill-based games, such as daily fantasy sports.
On March 7, , the state of Virginia passed legislation regulating "fantasy contests", defined as skill-based games with cash prizes that are based on the "accumulated statistical results of the performance of individuals"; the law makes no reference to sports or DFS.
The law was criticized for being broadly-worded, with critics believing that it could feasibly apply to season-length games or any similar activities, and that the required licensing fee adds a financial barrier for doing business in the state.
On May 10, , it was reported that the U. In August , New York became the largest state to legalize daily fantasy sports. By the end of , 18 different states had legalized paid-entry fantasy sports contests.
On November 10, , Attorney General of New York State Eric Schneiderman issued a cease-and-desist order to DraftKings and FanDuel, arguing that DFS was illegal under state law which specifies that games where players "risk something of value" and do not have "control or influence" over the outcome, are gambling ,   and ordering the two services to cease serving residents of New York.
He stated that DFS "wagers" represented "a wager on a 'contest of chance' where winning or losing depends on numerous elements of chance to a 'material degree'".
He characterized the DFS industry as being a "massive, multi-billion-dollar scheme intended to evade the law and fleece sports fans across the country", causing the "same public health and economic problems associated with gambling, particularly for populations prone to gambling addiction and individuals who are unprepared to sustain losses, lured by the promise of easy money.
In response, DraftKings and FanDuel filed lawsuits against the state of New York on November 13, arguing that their games were one of skill, they had been denied due process due to the Attorney General's abruptness, that he does not have the power to make such a ruling, and that Schneiderman engaged in tortious interference by sending cease and desist notices to their payment processors.
Following the hearing, a spokesperson for the Attorney General declared that he could file a formal lawsuit against the two sites "as soon as tomorrow".
The same day, state senator Michael Ranzenhofer introduced a bill that would explicitly classify daily fantasy sports as a game of skill.
On November 17, , the Attorney General filed a request for a temporary injunction to force DraftKings and FanDuel to cease serving customers in the state of New York.
In the filing, Schneiderman argued that DFS was merely a "re-branding" of sports betting, and in response to claims that DFS constitutes a game of skill, he argued that "a few good players in a poker tournament may rise to the top based on their skill; but the game is still gambling.
During hearings on November 25, , Judge Manuel J. Mendez disputed assertions by the services that a player's choice of athletes represents "control or influence" over the outcome, stating that players are ultimately "relying on someone else's skill" to determine an outcome.
Schneiderman also acknowledged the services' deceptive advertising practices, such as "convoluted" first deposit bonuses.
On January 11, , DraftKings' and FanDuel's stay was granted, meaning that they could continue to serve New York residents, pending the outcome of the appeal.
The Boston Globe believed that a ruling on the legality of DFS in New York State would have industry-wide implications, as it is one of the largest markets for these services.
Surowiecki argued that "given the absence of a good argument for why daily fantasy should be illegal in New York, while the lottery and racetrack betting and casinos are not, the best strategy that DraftKings and FanDuel could pursue might be to get the State Legislature to eliminate the inconsistency and explicitly legalize them.
On March 21, , the Attorney General announced a partial settlement of its lawsuit, under which DraftKings and FanDuel agreed to cease offering paid games in the state of New York, and abide by the result of an upcoming appeals court hearing.